The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on illegal sports betting.

No, they weren't personally in participation, however the world-famous celebrities were conspicuously included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes casinos - the controversial sites using both totally free casino-style games and rewarding rewards, such as money, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are simply 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of many video gaming corporations, not to discuss suit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos act as standard casinos, just without the oversight, consumer securities and tax laws. So not only can they prevent the steep 24-percent federal gaming levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulative obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits last year alone. Now the company faces accusations of prohibited gambling in a New York claim that declares VGW uses celeb endorsers to 'produce a veneer of legitimacy' around its product. (See VGW's declaration listed below)

'I'm unsure" if you don't trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of celebrities from sports betting enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, along with NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any distinctions in between traditional gambling and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among many sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to play at Chumba Casino, where numerous - but not all - games are totally free

Drake has an offer with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he regularly touts on social media

Find out more

Donald Trump 'set to call NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements generally center around the social aspect of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the potential for actual gaming losses.

Others tempt clients with guarantees of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media advertisement displaying Drake's cars and trucks, aircrafts and estates before pivoting to video footage of the rap artist playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot money?' check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption described: 'Because I never ever offered up.'

The disparity between gambling websites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complicated, however operators of the latter insist they're not included with the former.

A representative for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competition with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, the majority of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for totally free.

'Most social sweeps clients never ever buy,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the common deposit or bet size at real-money online sports betting websites.'

Social gambling establishments offer consumers an opportunity to play casino-style video games with good friends. Players have the choice to purchase worthless currency often referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for real cash, but can be used to unlock different functions within the video games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes video gaming, permitting consumers to acquire other currency known as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other rewards.

And therein lies the potential for financial losses, like the ones declared by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One gamer told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the previous year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of money and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker event

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an advertisement displaying Drake's automobiles, airplanes and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are banned in all but 7 states, which has actually helped to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not require generally require recognition. However, websites like Chumba will request IDs from players attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable customers to submit mail-in demands for totally free sweeps coins, supplied the players follow painfully specific guidelines. What's more, players are often rewarded with sweeps coins simply for registering, therefore providing them a factor to attempt their hands at any variety of casino games for an opportunity to win - or lose - genuine cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites enabled to run in 48 states, while online casinos are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the totally free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is simply a means of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes video games are merely a form of online entertainment,' an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is required to play at social gambling establishments with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never ever need to spend for a chance to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is a crucial difference between social sweeps and conventional online gaming websites like casinos.'

Think about the manner in which McDonald's uses its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, however rather they're buying hamburgers and french fries that use them the possibility to win financially rewarding prizes, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the game itself does not satisfy the definition of sports betting in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring approach for promoting all sort of daily organizations in the United States, everything from hamburgers to magazine memberships to coffee and home improvement stores,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are regularly used by a who's who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to numerous gambling market experts, that argument does not cut it.

For beginners, video gaming attorney Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald's Monopoly video game doesn't run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined beginning and end, thus recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last permanently and they're typically not tied to casino-style video games of possibility,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're simply cash giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] have none of the characteristics commonly related to McDonald's-design sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes gambling establishments provide" casino-like" payments, usually 80 percent or more of revenues, whereas the normal payout percentage for a short-term marketing sweepstakes is a minor share of the revenue earned by the company [usually less than one percent]'

Wallach is fast to liken the online social sweeps casinos to the internet coffee shops that sprang up in Florida, offering consumers the opportunity to play casino-style video games for real prizes. A number of those brick-and-mortar establishments have actually since been shuttered over accusations of prohibited gambling.

DJ Khaled is among several star spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments should face comparable scrutiny.

'These differences are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps casinos. 'They have actually consistently been mentioned by courts and state attorney general of the United States as crucial aspects in determining that a sweepstakes promotion was in truth a guise for prohibited gaming.'

One of the casino market's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing legislators to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact new legislation on the concern.

'Consumers are being deprived of securities and states are giving up significant tax and income opportunities as this sports betting replaces that conducted through regulated channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the complainants who have actually taken legal action against social gambling establishments in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 different cases in Kentucky without confessing any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW concurred to pay $11.75 million in one class-action claim, stating the settlement was made to avoid legal expenses and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has actually signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the newest claim, which is largely similar to its predecessors, New York state residents Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'unlawful gambling enterprise. '

Apple and Google have actually likewise been named as defendants in claims for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company responded to DailyMail.com's demand for comment.

'We generally do not talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW representative told DailyMail.com via e-mail. 'However, we note that this claim has actually only simply been submitted with the court and VGW has actually not been formally served.

'We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we operate, and stay confident about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to use our free-to-play video games throughout many of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a years, creating not just great video games, user experiences and home entertainment, however also guaranteeing this is done securely, responsibly and at the greatest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are relatively typical throughout the online social games industry (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we plan to vigorously defend any claim which may be brought against us.'

The issues in between standard online gaming and sweepstakes casinos could show troublesome for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with standard gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that expert athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting wagering 'sweeps' sites while at the same time the leagues wish to predict a strong stance against prohibited sports betting - specifically when attempting to tamp down the occasional gaming scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was just eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a life time restriction from the NBA over claims he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything including social or sweepstakes casinos.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being sued for hosting presumably illegal sports betting sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major issue for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on athletes backing sweepstakes sites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser added.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the players' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's requests for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise ignored to respond to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have a responsibility to describe to customers the differences and resemblances between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have full confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our organization practices more broadly,' the representative stated. 'Some of our values are" our players come first" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who provide their names to dubious illegal sports betting websites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at risk in addition to courting civil and class actions by customers who allege damage,' Glaser stated. 'There is likewise some risk that state regulators and state attorney generals of the United States rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in unlawful gaming.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton