The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on illegal gambling.

No, they weren't personally in attendance, however the world-famous celebrities were notably included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos - the questionable websites offering both complimentary casino-style video games and financially rewarding prizes, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for totally free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of many gaming corporations, not to mention claim plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments serve as conventional gambling establishments, just without the oversight, customer securities and tax laws. So not only can they avoid the high 24-percent federal gaming levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulatory difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming securities.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in earnings in 2015 alone. Now the company faces accusations of unlawful gaming in a New York claim that declares VGW utilizes celebrity endorsers to 'produce a veneer of legitimacy' around its item. (See VGW's statement listed below)

'I'm unsure" if you do not trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of celebs from gambling enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, along with NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom provide any distinctions in between conventional gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of lots of sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to play at Chumba Casino, where numerous - but not all - games are totally free

Drake has an offer with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he frequently touts on social networks

Read More

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, ads usually focus around the social element of the gambling establishments, while omitting the capacity for real gambling losses.

Others lure clients with promises of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks ad flaunting Drake's vehicles, aircrafts and mansions before rotating to footage of the rap artist playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much cash?' check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption explained: 'Because I never ever gave up.'

The discrepancy between gaming websites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complicated, but operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the former.

A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competitors with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, many of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are sports betting complimentary.

'Most social sweeps customers never ever buy,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller sized than the normal deposit or bet size at real-money online gaming sites.'

Social gambling establishments provide clients a chance to play casino-style games with good friends. Players have the option to purchase worthless currency typically referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, but can be utilized to open different functions within the video games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes video gaming, enabling customers to obtain other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other rewards.

And therein lies the capacity for financial losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One gamer informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Global Poker event

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an ad showing off Drake's cars, planes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are prohibited in all however 7 states, which has assisted to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which do not need typically need identification. However, sites like Chumba will request IDs from gamers trying to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit customers to send mail-in ask for free sweeps coins, supplied the gamers follow painfully particular guidelines. What's more, gamers are often rewarded with sweeps coins merely for signing up, consequently providing a factor to attempt their hands at any number of casino video games for a chance to win - or lose - genuine cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites enabled to operate in 48 states, while online casinos are prohibited in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competition is merely a means of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes games are simply a type of online home entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is needed to play at social casinos with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never ever have to spend for a chance to win rewards. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is a vital distinction between social sweeps and traditional online sports betting websites like casinos.'

Consider the way that McDonald's utilizes its yearly Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, however rather they're purchasing hamburgers and french fries that use them the chance to win profitable rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the game itself doesn't fulfill the meaning of sports betting in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing method for promoting all type of everyday companies in the United States, whatever from hamburgers to publication subscriptions to coffee and home enhancement shops,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are frequently utilized by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to numerous gambling industry insiders, that argument does not cut it.

For beginners, video gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald's Monopoly video game does not run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined beginning and end, thus recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote genuine items like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last permanently and they're generally not tied to casino-style video games of opportunity,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're just cash free gifts.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] possess none of the qualities frequently related to McDonald's-style sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes casinos offer" casino-like" payouts, normally 80 percent or more of earnings, whereas the common payment portion for a short-term marketing sweepstakes is an insignificant share of the income made by the company [generally less than one percent]'

Wallach is fast to liken the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the internet cafes that emerged in Florida, providing customers the opportunity to play casino-style games for genuine rewards. Much of those brick-and-mortar facilities have actually since been shuttered over accusations of illegal gaming.

DJ Khaled is amongst several star spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments need to deal with comparable scrutiny.

'These differences are not approximate,' Wallach stated of social sweeps casinos. 'They have consistently been mentioned by courts and state attorney general of the United States as key consider identifying that a sweepstakes promotion was in fact a guise for unlawful gambling.'

One of the casino industry's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact brand-new legislation on the concern.

'Consumers are being deprived of protections and states are giving up significant tax and revenue opportunities as this gambling changes that performed through controlled channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the complainants who have sued social casinos in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without admitting any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW concurred to pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most recent lawsuit, which is mainly similar to its predecessors, New York state residents Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'prohibited sports betting enterprise. '

Apple and Google have actually likewise been called as offenders in suits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment.

'We typically do not talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by means of e-mail. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has only simply been submitted with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

'We have complete confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we operate, and stay positive about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play video games across many of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a years, producing not just fantastic video games, user experiences and home entertainment, but also ensuring this is done safely, properly and at the greatest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are reasonably typical throughout the online social games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we plan to vigorously defend any claim which might be brought against us.'

The issues between conventional online gaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments could prove troublesome for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with standard video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that expert athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting 'sweeps' sites while at the same time the leagues want to project a strong stance versus prohibited gambling - particularly when attempting to tamp down the occasional sports betting scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was just eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime ban from the NBA over claims he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything involving social or sweepstakes casinos.

In addition to VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting apparently illegal sports betting websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a significant issue for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes sites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the players' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's requests for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also overlooked to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have a duty to explain to clients the distinctions and resemblances between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have complete self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our company practices more broadly,' the spokesperson stated. 'A few of our values are" our players precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who provide their names to shady unlawful gaming websites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at threat in addition to courting civil and class actions by customers who allege damage,' Glaser stated. 'There is likewise some risk that state regulators and state attorney generals of the United States rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with prohibited gambling.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton